This you find around the ๐ŸŒ Internet
๐Ÿ” Web search with Google โ€ข Bing โ€ข DuckDuckGo โ€ข Marginalia โ€ข Reddit โ€ข Spotify โ€ข TikTok โ€ข Tootfinder โ€ข X โ€ข Yandex โ€ข Youtube โ€ข YTM
This you find in the ๐Ÿ›๏ธ Agora
๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Stoas for [[@neil/french repair index]]
A Stoa is a public space where people can meet and collaborate.
๐Ÿ“– Document at https://doc.anagora.org/french repair index
๐Ÿ“น Meeting at https://framatalk.org/french repair index
๐Ÿ“š Node [[french repair index]]
โ†ณ ๐Ÿ““ Resource [[@neil/french repair index]]
๐Ÿ““ garden/neil/french-repair-index.md by @neil ๏ธ๐Ÿ”— โœ๏ธ

French repair index

Been having fun looking at [[repairability scores]] from the [[French repair index]] as displayed on Amazon.fr.

Impressive how prominent they are (being mandated to be placed next to the price).

Important to bear in mind the caveats around Franceโ€™s index as it currently stands (e.g. here and here).

I see that Fairphone 4 gets a 9.3 (Amazon link), Samsung Galaxy S24 gets an 8.5 (Amazon link), iPhone 15 Pro gets a 7.6 (Amazon link). Based on that Iโ€™m not sure that the repair scores as they stand would be enough of a signal to compel or deter a purchase of a particular item.

As mentioned in the above article on repair.eu:

Overall, most displayed grades are quite good (between 6 and 8/10). In order to reflect the true repairability of products, HOP recommends a revision of the scoring system by questioning the weighting of the various criteria. Indeed, while a very low score on a criterion such as disassembly, availability or cost of spare parts means repair is almost impossible, the current grading system allows a product to still get a decent grade, despite performing poorly on the criteria above.

One year on, has the French repair index kept its promises?

A stronger repair index displayed so prominently would be amazing

Loading pushes...

Rendering context...